The Dilemma of the Existence of Inland Communities: A Description & Prescription Analysis of Development Experience in Papua

Authors

  • Akbar Silo Universitas Cenderawasih Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/aee1rb06

Keywords:

Indigenous Community, Papua, Rural Development, Cultural Adaptation, Policy Dilemma

Abstract

This article discusses the dilemma of the existence of indigenous communities in Papua amidst the pressure of modernization and the historical construction of development policies that often neglect local wisdom. The main objective of this study is to explore the dynamics of rural community development in Papua by analyzing descriptive and prescriptive experiences embedded in state-led development interventions. The study aims to critically examine how traditional cultural values interact with national development policies, especially within the framework of Papua's Special Autonomy. Using a qualitative approach through a literature study method, this research gathers relevant theories, policy documents, and historical records to identify patterns of transformation, resistance, and adaptation among inland communities. The findings indicate that the uniform top-down development model implemented in Papua has failed to accommodate the socio-cultural realities of local communities. Instead of empowering, these models often lead to marginalization and cultural disintegration. The research also reveals that indigenous responses to development are not passive but are reflected in hybrid forms of adaptation-combining traditional lifestyles with selective adoption of modern elements. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of cultural sensitivity, community-based policy design, and harmonization between state interests and indigenous aspirations. In conclusion, the future of rural development in Papua lies in a participatory, contextual, and inclusive approach that recognizes the pluralistic nature of Papuan society and upholds the spirit of autonomy

References

Campbell, T. (1981). Seven Theories of Human Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxfor University Press

Garna, K. Y. (1999). Basic Social Sciences-Concepts-Positions. Primaco Academika. Bandung.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.

Harsojo. (1977). Introduction to Anthropology. Bina Cipta. Jakarta.

Hastuti, E. L., & Supadi, S. (2004). Community Accessibility to Agricultural Financing Institutions in Rural Areas. SOCA: Journal of Agricultural Social Economics, 5(2), 43936.

Hylland, T. E. (2001). Lain Padang, Lain Belalang: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. http://folk.uio.no/geirthe/Antropologi_sosial.html

Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Introduction to the Science of Anthropology. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Magnis-Suseno. F. (1999). Philosophizing from Context. Gramedia. Jakarta.

Marzali, A. (1996). THE FAILURE OF OUR ANTROPOLOGY. http://www.hamline.edu/ apakabar/basisdata/1996/05/03/0013.html

Pranadji, T. (2003). Diagnosing the institutional fragility of the rural economy. In Agroeconomic Research Forum, 21(2): 128-142.

Rozi, M. (2006). Anthropology is still seen as a useless science. UGM Postgraduate Anthropology Study Program. http://www.kompas.com/ kompas-print/ 0507/30/humanities/1937647.htm

Siregar, L. (2002). Anthropology and the concept of culture. Journal of Papuan Anthropology, 1(1), 1-12.

Suparlan, P. (1984). Culture and Development, paper in Seminar on Population and Development. Jakarta: MOE

Zed, M. (2004). Library Research Methods. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Dilemma of the Existence of Inland Communities: A Description & Prescription Analysis of Development Experience in Papua. (2025). Multitech Journal of Science and Technology (MJST), 2(5), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.59890/aee1rb06