The Change in Grading Rules for Architecture Students with the Arrival of New Information Technologies

Authors

  • Jorge Pablo Aguilar Zavaleta Cesar Vallejo University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/yvdexr26

Keywords:

Architecture, Architecture Students, Rules, Technologies

Abstract

The emergence of information technology (IT) has profoundly transformed assessment systems in architectural education, shifting the traditional approach toward alternative models that prioritize equity, self-regulation, and mastery of real competencies. This article examines how approaches such as specification grading, contract grading, and mastery-based assessment are reshaping grading rules in response to an increasingly digitalized and autonomous student profile. This evolution is enhanced by tools such as BIM, 3D modeling software, and virtual collaborative environments, which allow for the assessment of creative processes, problem-solving, and critical thinking in real time. Recent studies indicate that 84% of students in active classrooms report a significant increase in their motivation and academic performance (Architecture Now, 2023). However, challenges remain: the standardization of assessment criteria and the technological gap between institutions still hinder widespread implementation. The article concludes that, in a context where creativity, adaptability, and collaboration are essential, innovation in assessment strategies is not only necessary but inevitable. Architectural education must align with the complexity of the 21st century, promoting environment

References

(S/f-c). Harvarddesignmagazine.org. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/articles/innovate-or-perish-new-technologies-and-architectures-future/

(S/f-e). Researchgate.net. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306045729_Student _perceptions_of_the_fairness_of_grading_procedures_a_ multilevel_ investigation _of_the_role_of_the_academic_environment

alternative grading systems that foster student development. (2020, diciembre 17). School of Education Online. https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/alternative-grading-systems/

Alternative approaches to assessment. (s/f). Harvard.edu. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/beyond-the-grade

Alternative grading for college courses. (s/f). Unl.edu. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://teaching.unl.edu/resources/grading-feedback/alternative-grading/

Alternative grading. (2025, junio 8). Miami.edu. https://academictechnologies.it.miami.edu/explore-technologies/technology-summaries/alternative-grading/index.html

Alternative grading. (2025, junio 8). Miami.edu. https://academictechnologies.it.miami.edu/explore-technologies/technology-summaries/alternative-grading/index.html

Bayhan, H. G., & Karaca, E. (2020). Technological innovation in architecture and engineering education - an investigation on three generations from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00207-0

Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, H. K. (2024). The contribution of digital tools to architectural design studio: A case study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(7), 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102795

Chiaravalli, A. (2023, julio 30). We need to talk about standards-based grading. Grow Beyond Grades. https://growbeyondgrades.org/blog/we-need-to-talk-about-sbg

Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, & National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser, Eds.). National Academies Press.

Exploring the impact o. (s/f). Anfarch.org. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://anfarch.org/research-topics/user-experience-and-well-being/page/exploring-the-impact-of-architectural-design-on-educational-engagement

Gumusel, B. (2025, febrero 11). Use of modern technologies in architectural education. Illustrarch. https://illustrarch.com/articles/42289-use-of-modern-technologies-in-architectural-education.html

Innovative approaches to architecture education in the digital era. (2024, octubre 8). ArchEyes. https://archeyes.com/innovative-approaches-to-architecture-education-in-the-digital-era/

Kesler, T. (2024). This course is ungraded: The impact of ungrading practices on students and their instructor. International Journal of Changes in Education. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewijce42023565

Kollman, A. (2023, noviembre 3). Making the switch to evidence-based grading. Edutopia; George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://www.edutopia.org/article/transitioning-to-evidence-based-grading/

Marks, L. (2025, enero 30). Improving engagement with standards-based grading. Turnitin.com. https://www.turnitin.com/blog/the-impact-of-traditional-vs-standards-based-grading-on-student-success

Potkalitsky, N. (2024, agosto 28). UPGRADING the letter grading system in middle and high school (guest post by Terry Underwood). Linkedin.com. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/upgrading-letter-grading-system-middle-high-school-potkalitsky-phd-cwaee

School of architecture courses. Carnegie Mellon university. (s/f). Cmu.edu. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de http://coursecatalog.web.cmu.edu/schools-colleges/collegeoffinearts/schoolofarchitecture/courses/

Smart learning environments. (s/f). SpringerOpen. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://slejournal.springeropen.com/

Steelcase Research. (s/f). How classroom design affects student engagement. Architecture Now. Recuperado el 11 de junio de 2025, de https://architecturenow.co.nz/articles/how-classroom-design-affects-student-engagement/

Streifer, A., Palmer, M., & Taggart, J. (2024). From expectations to experiences: Students’ perceptions of specifications grading in higher education. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2024.180205

Streifer, A., Palmer, M., & Taggart, J. (2024). From expectations to experiences: Students’ perceptions of specifications grading in higher education. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2024.180205

The grading podcast. (2024, febrero 13). The Grading Podcast. https://thegradingpod.com/episodes/31-the-role-of-effort-or-work-in-an-alternative-grading-architecture-and-the-relationship-with-due-dates/

Tlapek, J. (2024, septiembre 1). The role of technology in modern architecture studios. ArchAdemia. https://archademia.com/blog/the-role-of-technology-in-modern-architecture-studios/?srsltid=AfmBOoqMm-taCjTsneENunzZkAdHSVoZmZpAnYi4gtHa0nTp3V8KA9Sj

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Change in Grading Rules for Architecture Students with the Arrival of New Information Technologies. (2025). Multitech Journal of Educational Sciences (MJES), 2(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.59890/yvdexr26